(no subject)

[mitrius]

А скажите, ведь наверняка уже кто-нибудь обыгрывал один из самых знаменитых семиотических текстов "What is Montague? it is nor hand, nor foot, Nor arm, nor face, nor any other part" в связи с формальной семантикой?

(Впрочем, тому Монтекки, который семасиолог, Джульетты не надо было -- скорее Тибальт)

Comments

[ermite-17.livejournal.com]

Еще один известный семиотический текст:

FALSTAFF. Can honour set to a leg? No. Or an arm? No. Or take away the grief of a wound? No. Honour hath no skill in surgery then? No. What is honour? A word. What is that word honour? Air. A trim reckoning! Who hath it? He that died a Wednesday. Doth he feel it? No. Doth be bear it? No. 'Tis insensible then? Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living? No. Why? Detraction will not suffer it. Therefore I'll none of it. Honour is a mere scutcheon - and so ends my catechism.

Catechism - потому что вопросно-ответная форма.

[bhp1.livejournal.com]

That's nice! If anyone has used it in connection with formal semantics, I haven't heard about it!